Hoskinson highlighted the fact that the blockchain industry is a progressive field and there must be constant evolution.
Charles Hoskinson, the CEO of Cardano, recently stated that he does not believe in Bitcoin and its scalability in the future, and he believes that it is more of a symbol of culture rather than a functional system.
Hoskinson highlighted the fact that the blockchain industry is a progressive field and there must be constant evolution. He also noted that although Bitcoin has the advantage of being the pioneer, it needs to adapt in order to survive. He insisted that Bitcoin is not self sufficient and the industry did not need it to survive anymore.
“it’s a religion, not an ecosystem,” Charles stated and went on to question whether Bitcoin is capable of evolving and addressing the needs of the contemporary world in terms of technological infrastructure.
Hoskinson further underlined that Cardano has been working on the scientific basis of blockchain, and the company has created a proof of stake protocol that can help to solve the problem of blockchain scalability, which will be important for cryptocurrency in the future.
This development process is notable and stands in stark contrast to Bitcoin’s current state, which he feels has not progressed much in terms of technology. Furthermore, the Cardano CEO stated that despite the importance of Bitcoin in the development of the industry, the sector could thrive without it.
Hoskinson’s opinion is that it is possible to get trapped by concentrating on Bitcoin alone since it may hinder the invention and adaptation that is required for the block chain technology.
The industry is constantly expanding, and Hoskinson’s comments suggest a rising concern that Bitcoin needs to change or it will become obsolete.
However, new platforms such as Cardano are constantly exploring the capabilities of blockchain technology and envision a world where functionality and productivity could be the dominant factors differentiating market frontrunners from the rest in terms of conventional dominance.